|
New research investigates the efficiency and democratic implications of the European Union's use of non-legislative processes for climate governance.
The key findings are:
Efficiency: Both delegated and implementing acts are efficient for making technical amendments to existing climate laws.
Democratic Deficiencies: Despite their efficiency, these processes show significant weaknesses across four democratic pillars, accountability, representation, knowledge and participation.
The report concludes that a fundamental tension exists between the need for efficient regulatory updates and the commitment to democratically robust policymaking. It calls for further research to address this tension, especially in a political context where the European Parliament may be a less ambitious climate actor.
Read the full paper: https://zenodo.org/records/17527070
|